Lee & Kirby & Ditko: The Minor Mystery of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #8

The early Marvel titles are filled with all manner of mysteries, large and small. The greatest of these concern who among the various contributors were they key creative minds behind the success of the imprint–and that’s a conversation that I don’t think is ever going to abate, given that every faction has their own favorites to whom they are partisan, and nothing will deter them from their worldview–whether that worldview espouses the greatness of Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko or whomever.

But once again, that’s not really what we’re going to be talking about today. Here, I want to examine a much more minor mystery, and to connect a few dots. My speculation here may be correct, or it may be way off the mark–so many years after the fact, it’s difficult to tell. And a good portion of that is the fact that these early Marvel books were simply being pulled together rapidly by a skeleton crew of creators who were looking to put food on the table and had no conception that anybody might be thinking about this stuff half a century later. So things that matter to the hardcore comic book historian weren’t of any great import to those in the thick of things.

In any event, AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #8 includes a short back-up story in which Spider-Man meets and battles the Human Torch and the rest of the Fantastic Four. What’s notable about this story is that it wasn’t drawn by ASM’s regular illustrator, Steve Ditko, but rather by the FF’s mainstay Jack Kirby. (Ditko did ink the story in question.) And looking at this and thinking about it, it’s a very odd choice to make eight issues into the run of ASM. And while it was promotable on the cover, it meant that Ditko’s lead story had to be shorter than usual. So what was the deal here?

My suspicion, thinking about this, was that this story began its life intended for another home, and it only wound up in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #8 in order to use it, to burn off the inventory. If this was the plan, it explains why and how Ditko’s lead tale could be the appropriate number of pages shorter, and how the story could be plugged on the cover–Ditko always did his ASM covers last.

So where was SPIDER-MAN TACKLES THE TORCH intended to run? And why did it wind up getting bumped to ASM #8? He’s my theory.

The biggest clue I had was that the story was only 6 pages long–shorter than a typical HUMAN TORCH solo adventure in STRANGE TALES, shorter than most of the stories being produced at this moment, in particular the super hero tales. But there was one other 6-page story that fit both the timeframe and the bill–and that’s the short Spider-Man meets the Fantastic Four story in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL #1.

FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL #1 had been prepared a number of months earlier, at around the time of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #4. As part of his larger promotional campaign for the burgeoning Marvel line of characters, editor Stan Lee chose to spotlight Spider-Man in this oversized issue of his best-selling series. Even on the preliminary, unused cover, Spider-Man is called out prominently–and his figure was even increased in size at some point before the decision was made to use a different piece entirely.

The story that actually runs in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL #1 is a weird one. It expands on the drive-by first meeting of Spidey and the Fantastic Four from AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #1, adding additional action and incident into it in order to fill out the space. Throughout it, Jack Kirby is forced to incorporate Steve Ditko’s original page compositions, as this new story is meant to fit in and around the cracks of the earlier one. That’s a weird thing to ask Kirby to do–Jack was always more about coming up with new stories than revisiting old ones, in particular a story that he had nothing to do with.

Looking at the two stories side-by-side, it’s clear that the one from AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #1 came first. Some of Kirby’s choreography on the later story doesn’t quite add up properly (Reed being freed from Spidey’s web by an otherwise-calm Thing and them stretching himself into a wall to hold an irate Thing back, for example.) And really all the story does is to create more action in that earlier encounter. And I suspect that’s the key to why it was done.

Here’s what I think happened.

Stan wanted to do a story spotlighting their new character Spider-Man in the Annual, and Kirby went off and plotted and penciled the six-page tale that would become SPIDER-MAN TACKLES THE TORCH for that purpose. In the meantime, Lee began to get feedback on AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #1–whether this came in the most obvious form of the fan mail that he was soliciting, or in-person reactions from fans he encountered, or a mix of the two, I couldn’t say. But in whatever form it came, the message got back to him that the readers felt that they had jobbed out the Fantastic Four in ASM #1 in order to make Spider-Man look cooler–there was no way that a scrawny runt like Spider-Man should be so easily able to take on the entire Fantastic Four!

So when Kirby brought in the pages for the FF ANNUAL, Lee told him about a change-of-plans. Rather than the new story that Kirby had drawn, Lee wanted to take that earlier encounter from ASM #1 and expand it into a full 6-page battle epic, one that would show the full array of the Fantastic Four’s abilities while still maintaining Spider-Man’s victory. This, he hoped, would placate the fans. Taking a copy of that story from ASM #1 with him (probably in the form of a printed copy of the book) Kirby proceeded to draw the replacement story for FF ANNUAL #1. Ditko was brought in to ink it, to help preserve the look of Spider-Man and the consistency (as he would also do for the longer Human Torch/Spider-Man team-up in STRANGE TALES ANNUAL #2 at around the same time.)

Later, wanting to use the six pages Kirby had drawn rather than simply discarding them, Lee decided to script them to run in an issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN. Again, Ditko would ink the pages. It’s possible this coincided with some greater demand on Ditko’s time, which would have made the loss of six pages a boon rather than a hardship. But it’s just as likely that it’s just a decision that was made regardless. It’s pretty clear that SPIDER-MAN TACKLES THE TORCH was scripted as a Spider-Man story, even though Spidey plays more as the antagonist in it. The original art board mark-ups also match those of the lead story in ASM #8, so if this was the case, the story was never labeled as part of FF ANNUAL #1, it was simply put to the side.

ADDITIONAL: Glen David Gold was able to point me in the direction of a scan for a page from the lead story in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #8 that shows clearly that it was cut up and hand sequences rearranged. Whether this means that the “Living Brain” story was initially intended to be longer and was edited down to make room for “Spidey Tackles The Torch”, I can’t really say. But that lead story was definitely edited in a very intrusive and hands on fashion.

18 thoughts on “Lee & Kirby & Ditko: The Minor Mystery of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #8

  1. haha. You have entirely too much time on your hands!! But still…an oddly enjoyable read. Did you work in production for the superhero publishers at some point? Your name sounds familiar…!!


  2. This was a very interesting observation. I wonder if the reason was twofold. Ditko had already been clashing with Lee on some of his ideas for Spider-Man. Maybe issue 8 was a chance for Lee to see if he could replace him with Kirby. He might have wanted to see how fans responded to a Jack Kirby Spider-Man story and used this a chance to find out. Any thoughts?


    1. While not impossible, I don’t think that is likely. Lee wouldn’t have worried about replacing Ditko with Kirby that early on—Kirby was the firm’s top artist, on their best-selling title. Also, that story is a Spider-Man story in name only. If you were doing a try-out piece, you’d want to see Kirby do Peter Parker—something he’d already done in Strange Tales Annual #2.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Tom.

    Per your speculation on “greater demands on Ditko’s time” it was in this period that deadlines forced Lee to shuffle his artists. When ASM # 8 was published Ditko was subbing for Don Heck on Iron Man, who in turn was moved to the Thor feature, likely due to Kirby being occupied with the new Avengers. X-Men and Sgt. Fury titles. Ditko also inked Kirby on Giant-Man in Astonish # 50, which appears to have also been deadline-related (it was one of the few instances where Ditko did not embellish, but apparently followed Kirby’s pencils).Shortening the Spider-Man story may have allowed Ditko to work on those other assignments.


  4. Great essay — I love the speculation and the evidence underlying it. One thing that might be a fact (or not): the original art the the first story in ASM 8, The Terrible Threat of the Living Brain, is unusual in that many of the panel pages are cut and paste jobs, with multiple panels rearranged. I haven’t seen another Ditko book where this was true – possibly the story needed to lose a page or two at the last second?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. My old auction catalogues are in storage but the 1996 CHRISTIE’S auction split the ASM 8 first story up, and there is a photo and condition report for every page. The photos might be small, but it’s a start in case anyone has access to this catalogue.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Is it possible that Kirby was intended as the original artist for short stories that might have continued to appear in AF, despite being taken off AF 15 (because Ditko alerted Lee to the fact that Kirby was reusing ideas from the Fly)? Perhaps Lee then realised that Kirby wasn’t right for the character (or perhaps Kirby simply wasn’t available for a full-length ASM comic). That would explain why there were a couple of Kirby stories to use as fill-ins later. Ditko has stated that the plots in the early ASMs came from Lee, so perhaps Lee simply re-used the idea of Spidey battling the FF in the Chameleon intro in ASM 1 because he didn’t think it would get used (or just liked the scenes Kirby created). It would also explain why Lee always recalled rejecting the Kirby version ‘because it looked so heroic/muscular’…he was actually recalling why Kirby didn’t continue as the regular artist.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think this theory is far more likely which was covered in the Kirby Collector 66, where Kirby’s FF meets Spider-Man 6 page story clearly came first and Ditko’s 2 page story was swiped for ASM #1. Jean Depelley who wrote the article outlines all the facts and chronologically this story from ASM 8 is tied in as well. The overall thought is that early on Lee wasn’t truly convinced Spidey was going to Ditko and gave Kirby at least one story in the first four, which at the time were still slated for Amazing Fantasy before it was canceled. One of those stories was the Spider-Man meets the Fantastic Four, which chronologically comes before ST Annual 2 and of course the subject issue here. Furthermore, Kirby drew the cover scene to ASM #1, which has the FF and Spider-man! And it would be highly unlikely for Kirby to work backwards and retell a story a few months earlier and expand it from 2 to 6 pages. Theres less detail in Kirby’s work and more detail in the story from Ditko, which logic dictates when adding detail to art it comes after the original. There’s no production notes or paste ups on the FF annual 1 spidey pages from Kirby. Thus, it’s far more likely this story along with the FF Annual 1 story was shelved inventory in which Marvel had already paid for and used it when needed to fill the gaps. I’d highly encourage you to read the Kirby Collector 66 article…


      1. I’ve read that piece, and I don’t agree with its conclusions at all. One only needs to look at the two stories side by side to see the difference in storytelling approach between Ditko and Kirby, and how Kirby is having to fit his new actions in awkwardly between moments that Ditko has already established. The Kirby pages are simply awkward and unnatural—because he’s needing to work from what Ditko has already done.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s